To study abroad, or to not study abroad; that is the
question of all sophomores at this time of the year. It’s an important decision, and a scary
one. To not know where I was going to be
living next year, whether it be in Ireland or here in Worcester, is
an intimidating thought. I’ve always
known that I wanted to study abroad, but the hardest decision was deciding
whether I should go for a semester or a year.
I went through leaps and bounds to be allowed to go for the
semester. A year was just too long; I
wouldn’t be able to run track junior year or see any of my friends or just
simply be on the hill. I was told that
there was a small possibility I could go to University College Dublin for the
first semester, but it wasn’t set in stone.
I told myself that if that opportunity became a concrete option, then
that was what I would do. If it wasn’t
an option, I would just stick it out and go to Trinity College for the year because it was only a
year long program. I told myself that I’d
rather go for the year than not go at all.
About a week before the deadline for study abroad, I was
told that I definitely had the option to go to University College Dublin for
the semester. You’d think I’d be jumping
up and down, excited I was granted the opportunity. But now, the decision was completely up to
me; not the study abroad office, only me.
I was accountable for the choice. I couldn’t blame it on anyone. I had no external justification, meaning I
couldn’t use the fact that I didn’t have a choice as an excuse to my friends or
family or even to myself if I ended up making the wrong choice. Similar to the cognitive dissonance affecting perception study that we looked at in class, having a high-choice compared to a low-choice on a difficult decision causes more of a need to reduce cognitive dissonance. I found myself going back and forth on my
decision multiple times throughout a single day. Part of the day I could completely picture
myself going for the year and then later, I would be completely convinced
that the semester was the right choice.
I made pros and cons list, talked to my entire family, friend group, and
study abroad ambassadors about it. Every
conversation made me more conflicted.
While this predicament lasted for a month and a half, and being especially difficult during the week before the deadline, we were learning about
cognitive dissonance in class, specifically post-decision dissonance. We learned that once you make a decision, you
are going to focus more on the positive aspects of your choice and ignore the
negative ones in order to reduce cognitive dissonance. I couldn’t imagine myself ignoring any of the
negative aspects, being that if I go for the year I won’t see my friends, family,
or be able to run track; or if I go for the semester, I wouldn’t have the full
experience, I wouldn’t be able to get an internship, and I wouldn’t be able to
go to Trinity, the more prestigious of the two schools. Both sets of cons seemed entirely equal.
The day before the deadline, I made the decision to apply to
Trinity College for the year as my first choice. Even though I made it only because I had to make a choice that day and I happened to talk to people right before who convinced me to go to Trinity, I almost immediately felt relieved once I finalized the decision. I do believe that deep down it was the better choice, even if I did send my application only 5 minutes after deciding. I think part of the reason why I applied so quickly after I made the final choice was because I knew that post-decision dissonance would occur once I submitted it, and it did. The finality of my decision
and the importance of it increased my need to reduce my cognitive
dissonance. Now, I more intensely
believe the pros of my decision and ignore or dismiss the cons. For example, I realize more now that I will be home for
winter and summer break to see friends and family and I can always do track
again senior year. Even though I’ve
always been interested in Trinity, hence why it was at least an option, I am
now even more interested and more excited about it since I have made my
decision. The post-decision dissonance caused the spreading of my
alternatives to occur because I am more confident that Trinity is the right
choice and that UCD was the wrong one for me.
To take this a step further, I read a study about
post-decision consonance done by Mao Wen and Harmen Oppewal. The study investigated the effects of
post-purchase reinforcement and inconsistent reinforcement on consumer
satisfaction and perceived service quality.
Post-purchase reinforcement is when someone is given information that is
consistent with their choice. Choice-inconsistent
reinforcement is when someone is given information that goes against their
choice. In the experiment they told a
group of college students about university rankings that is consistent with
their choice of university and told the other half of the group about university
rankings that is inconsistent with their choice of university. The results were that being reminded of
negative aspects of their choice of school does not reduce the students’
consumer satisfaction or perceived service quality. In fact, there was no effect at all. Interestingly however, the students who were
reminded of positive aspects of their choice of school had an improved consumer
satisfaction and perceived service quality.
This study can be related back to my study abroad
decision. I feel relaxed knowing that it
is likely, based on the results of this study, that even if I receive negative information on Trinity College or just about going for the year, it is not
going to affect me. But, if I receive
positive information about Trinity College or about going for the year, it is only
going to improve the confidence in my decision even more. Maybe it's the luck of the Irish that I was able to make this decision and be happy about it, or maybe it was the luck of cognitive dissonance.
Kelly O'Halloran
Mao, Wen, and Harmen Oppewal. "Did I Choose the Right University? how Post-Purchase Information Affects Cognitive Dissonance, Satisfaction and Perceived Service Quality." Australasian Marketing Journal 18.1 (2010): 28-35. ProQuest.Web. 15 Nov. 2015.
I had this same experience in deciding which school to apply to for study abroad. When we learned about cognitive dissonance, I knew that I just needed to make a choice, and I would be happy in the end. Post decision dissonance has made me confident that I made the right selection. Of the two programs I was debating between, I now feel sure that I choose the one I will enjoy and learn the most from.
ReplyDeleteEmily M