If you were asked to raise your hand if you were on
a dating site somewhere, whether it be tinder or more like match.com,
chances are you would raise your hand
(or maybe not, but you’re still on it). Truth is: technology has completely changed the dating game. These social media staples allow
you to meet individuals anywhere without the heart-fluttering, nerve-wracking decision
to strike up a conversation in person, totally exposed. You are handed a
freedom that puts you in control of your love-life with the touch of a button or
swipe of a screen. But to be given a freedom means sacrifices must be made, sacrifices
like possibly compromising your own safety by meeting someone you met from behind a screen.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that meeting your
significant other online as opposed to in person is a bad thing. I met my
boyfriend through Facebook the summer before my freshman year of college. We are
perfectly happy, although I do get a little embarrassed when asked the “So how
did you two meet?” question. Everyone hears the horror stories about that “creepy”
guy your friend met on tinder or a “stalker” girl that won’t stop messaging you
on Facebook. This phenomenon of people lying about who they are online even was
given a term: cat-fishing. A TV show was even made out of it! That’s how often
people do it and how often people fall for it. Every time I see Nev Schulman on
the screen analyzing someone’s profile for inconsistencies, I think “Wow, that
really could’ve been me.” To be honest, it can be any of us!
People take the anonymity of the World Wide Web as a
way to reinvent themselves. They become someone they feel that they can’t be in
person. It’s empowering knowing you can be the person you always wanted to be
online and that the people you’re contacting have no clue that it isn’t the
real you. Re-envisioning yourself isn’t new; most resumes aren’t complete
without a little bit of embellishment. But as more and more people turn to
social media to find their soulmates, it can become a problem, and dangerous. In truth,
without meeting in person you can’t really know what you’re getting into and
how much of a person’s profile is true. It’s a stigma that’s become attached to
online dating: you can’t trust anyone to be who they say they are online and should act cautiously.
In an experiment done by Billie E. Cali, Jill M. Coleman,
and Catherine Campbell, they wanted to see just how self-protective women would
become as a result of the online dating stigma as opposed to meeting someone
face-to-face. This was hypothesized to be greater for women who are new to online
dating and lower for those who were veterans, but all of them would show self-protective behavior when meeting someone online. 83 women were selected for this
study from a private Midwestern university. Participants were assigned to one
of two conditions based on their birth month and were presented with scenarios
about a hypothetical first date situations.
In one scenario, a situation was described where the
participant met someone on Facebook with whom she was interested in going on a
date. The second scenario described a situation in which the participant met
someone whom she was interested in dating from one of her classes. From these scenarios,
the women were asked to fill out a Dating Self-Protection Against Rape Scale(DSPARP). This
scale asked them to report how many safety related behaviors they would partake
in given their situation (i.e. letting a friend know where they were, meeting
somewhere public). The DSPARP consists of 15 items on a
Likert-type scale from 1 being "not at all important" to 6 being "very important," with higher scores indicating greater self-protection intent. Lastly, they were
given a dating background questionnaire to acquire information about previous
dating habits.
As predicted, women
thought self-protective behaviors were more important when going on a date with
someone they met on Facebook (or any online platform) as opposed to someone they had met at school. This
effect was sound when dealing with college-aged and adult women, and was even
stronger among individuals who had no prior experience dating someone they had
met online.
With that being said,
this increase in protective behavior does not mean online
dating is more dangerous than meeting someone at a bar. This study simply
implies that people, and specifically woman, are more cautious when meeting
with someone they haven’t had an in-person interaction with previously. So
continue onward on your dating app and don’t be afraid to meet up for drinks
with that cute guy that just happened to message you. Chances are you’re unconsciously
acting more self-protective than you would normally. Just know that you have
your own back! I am living proof that you can meet someone online (Facebook)
and end up having a very successful relationship.
Cali, Billie E., Jill M. Coleman, and Catherine Campbell. "Stranger Danger? Women’S Self-Protection Intent And The Continuing Stigma Of Online Dating."Cyberpsychology, Behavior, And Social Networking 16.12 (2013): 853-857. PsycINFO. Web. 5 Dec. 2015.
Rachel Sowinski
Wow! I never realized that online dating behavior could be measured in the way that Cali, Coleman, and Campbell did in their study on protective behaviors. It is really interesting to see that the new anonymity introduced by online dating (such as tinder or match.com as you described) significantly impacts protective behavior that is different from behavior exhibited in face-to-face dating interactions. Great post!
ReplyDeleteAwesome job! I find it great that people are doing social psychological research on issues of online dating. I can definitely see this occurring in everyday life, as like you said, there is this stigma about online dating and the ambiguous nature behind it.
ReplyDelete